首页> 外文OA文献 >Clinical Evaluation of a New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T)
【2h】

Clinical Evaluation of a New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T)

机译:新型压疮风险评估仪器,压疮风险主要或次要评估工具的临床评估(目的T)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim: To test the psychometric properties and clinical usability of a new Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instrument including inter-rater and test–retest reliability, convergent validity and data completeness. Background: Methodological and practical limitations associated with traditional Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instruments, prompted a programme to work to develop a new instrument, as part of the National Institute for Health Research funded, Pressure UlceR Programme Of reSEarch (RP-PG-0407-10056). Design: Observational field test. Method: For this clinical evaluation 230 patients were purposefully sampled across four broad levels of pressure ulcer risk with representation from 4 secondary care and 4 community NHS Trusts in England. Blinded and simultaneous paired (ward/community nurse and expert nurse) PURPOSE-T assessments were undertaken. Follow-up retest was undertaken by the expert nurse. Field notes of PURPOSE-T use were collected. Data were collected October 2012-Jan 2013. Results: The clinical evaluation demonstrated ‘very good’ (kappa) inter-rater and test–retest agreement for PURPOSE-T assessment decision overall. The percentage agreement for ‘problem/no problem’ was over 75% for the main risk factors. Convergent validity demonstrated moderate to high associations with other measures of similar constructs. Conclusion: The PURPOSE-T evaluation facilitated the initial validation and clinical usability of the instrument and demonstrated that PURPOSE-T is suitable of use in clinical practice. Further study is needed to evaluate the impact of using the instrument on care processes and outcomes.
机译:目的:测试新型压力性溃疡风险评估工具的心理测量特性和临床可用性,包括评估者之间和测试-再测试的可靠性,聚合效度和数据完整性。背景:与传统压力性溃疡风险评估工具相关的方法和实践上的局限性促使作为美国国立卫生研究院资助的研究性压力性溃疡研究计划(RP-PG-0407-10056)的一部分,该计划致力于开发一种新的工具)。设计:现场观察测试。方法:为了进行这项临床评估,从英格兰的4个二级保健和4个社区NHS信托基金的代表中,有针对性地抽取了4个广泛水平的压疮风险样本,共230例患者。进行了盲目和同时配对(病房/社区护士和专家护士)的PURPOSE-T评估。随访复检由专业护士进行。收集了PURPOSE-T使用的现场记录。收集了2012年10月至2013年1月的数据。结果:临床评估表明,PURPOSE-T评估决策总体上具有“非常好”(kappa)评估者和重新测试的协议。对于主要风险因素,“问题/没有问题”的达成百分比超过75%。收敛效度显示了与相似结构的其他度量的中等至高度关联。结论:PURPOSE-T评估有助于仪器的初步验证和临床可用性,并证明PURPOSE-T适合在临床实践中使用。需要进一步研究以评估使用该仪器对护理过程和结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号